Is the legal environment for medical malpractice ripe for change?

In Washington, DC, tort reform is a favorite cost-control idea of the party taking over in 2017. At the state level, Massachusetts is nearing the two-year anniversary of a new law that gives attorneys a chance to interview potential jurors in civil cases. We’ve now had enough time to see how lawyers are using this new ability, if not enough data to know that it changes trial results. But Boston defense attorney Ellen Cohen tells CRICO that she wouldn’t be surprised if it did: giving lawyers a chance to talk directly to potential jurors before selecting or rejecting them should result in a more unbiased jury at trial.

Still, some things never change when it comes to the courtroom and patients suing doctors.

Retired Massachusetts Superior Court Justice Hiller Zobel and Stephen Rous, MD just wrote a book describing the experience for physician defendants. The second edition of a book they published in the 1990s, “Doctors & the Law” guides physicians through the legal system. As the online synopsis says,

Even a doctor merely testifying as an ordinary witness or expert, can undergo acute feelings of uncertainty as to role and performance. This book is designed to educate, soothe, and encourage anyone entering the stormy seas of litigation.

The November issue of “CRICO Insights” features these developments and more about the court system that comes into play after a patient or family member sues their medical provider. The edition also has tips on 10 focus areas for patient safety from AHRQ, and includes a case study where miscommunication in the operating room led to a retained foreign body and a court settlement.

Medical providers are never likely to be comfortable in the courtroom. But learning more about how it works, how it affects themselves and colleagues, and what may change over time, may help.

Related Blog Posts

    1x1_auto_0106

    Telehealth Gone Wrong? Not After These Videos

    Blog Post
    Virtual visits can involve patients calling into their video appointment from the supermarket…fuzzy computer screens during examinations…even doctors “visiting” the wrong patient. These challenges and more present additional clinical and liability risks to busy practices delivering telehealth.
    1x1_auto_0011

    Best Practices for Employment Practices Liability Reporting

    Blog Post
    Reporting processes for complaints of unprofessional behavior vary across and within CRICO member organizations. This variability exposed an opportunity to identify practices that allow for a fair, prompt, consistent, and well-coordinated response to complaints of unprofessional behavior. Learn how you can manage wrongful acts in your workplace.
    1x1_auto_0068

    Structured Patient Handoffs Can Help Avoid Malpractice Cases

    Blog Post
    Using Candello data, researchers at Boston Children's Hospital demonstrated a link between patient handoff failures and malpractice cases. Further, they showed that, among cases involving a communication error, 77 percent of them could have been prevented by use of a structured handoff.
X
Cookies help us improve your website experience.
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies.
Confirm