A researcher’s request for accommodation leads to a hostile work environment.

Chronology of Events

Dr. Alice LeBrand, a cancer researcher, was nominated by her medical center for an academic promotion. When she learned, in the latter stage of the process, that her promotion was denied, she was overcome with disappointment. Her chronic—but mild—depression became severe.

LeBrand confided her situation to her research supervisor, Dr. Seth Eggelman. She emphasized that, with some accommodations recommended by her psychiatrist—specifically a role not dependent on grant-based funding—she could meet her obligations and deadlines. Eggelman consulted with the hospital’s Human Resources (HR) department. Ultimately, HR rejected LeBrand’s accommodation request because securing grants was an essential element of her job. Although disappointed, LeBrand told Eggelman that she understood the decision.

Without LeBrand’s consent, Eggelman, shared LeBrand’s health issues with Dr. Lo Tan, her co-author on a research paper that was in editorial review. Fearing an interruption of his work due to LeBrand’s situation, Tan criticized LeBrand’s work behind her back and berated her in front of mutual colleagues. LeBrand was eventually excluded from the publication. Tan was subsequently promoted based, in part, on this publication.

When LeBrand mentioned this contentious situation to Eggelman, he suggested that she might be happier in a different field of research. Unsure who to turn to, LeBrand spoke to her clinical division chief (Brown) about her difficult working environment, but then asked him “not to tell anyone.” Brown offered to help LeBrand move to another research laboratory, but told her he was obligated to report her concerns to HR. Three weeks later, at the end of her grant funding, Eggelman abruptly terminated LeBrand without consulting or notifying Brown or the HR staff. Meanwhile, a male colleague facing similar circumstances was provided with bridge funding.


After her termination, LeBrand filed a complaint with the state discrimination board alleging disability discrimination, a hostile work environment, and retaliation.


This case was settled on behalf of the medical center with a payment to LeBrand.

Discussion Points

  1. After LeBrand confided with him about her depression, what obligation did Eggelman have, if any, regarding her wellbeing?
  2. What role did Eggelman have in LeBrand filing her complaint?
  3. What contributed to LeBrand’s perception of a hostile work environment?
  4. How does retaliation impact LeBrand’s situation?

    Learn more about Employment Practices Liability

    Employment Practices Liability Cases

    CRICO’s harassment and discrimination case studies educate you on what can go wrong in business settings and how you can prevent similar issues.

      Was Age an Issue?

      Case Study
      A 64-year-old female registered nurse alleged that her 29-year-old manager purposely hired a young woman for an open position and commented about that new hire's youthful appearance.

      Declining Performance

      Case Study
      Throughout her employment, a Black patient service coordinator's multiple supervisors and colleagues had criticized her poor attendance and negative interactions with colleagues and patients. A year before her termination, the complainant received 2.9 out of 5 on her performance review, deemed by her employer as an unacceptable level.

      Excessive Tardiness

      Case Study
      A 72-year-old Black, Haitian male, who worked as an interpreter, was terminated after a lengthy history of performance issues. Over 12 years, the hospital had documented 16 instances of excessive tardiness, unscheduled absences, and other attendance-related infractions, as well as performance issues that violated protocol.
    Cookies help us improve your website experience.
    By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies.