A CRICO grantee sought to develop and test the feasibility of a Clinical Assist Decision Interface

Surgical safety checklists (time-outs) are integral to promoting safety by requiring a standardized assessment of safety items prior to starting a procedure. Although proven useful, a challenge is that safety checklists can become tedious to perform repeatedly. With the technical advances in electronic health records (EHRs) and informatics, a question—which this CRICO grant-funded project sought to research—was whether software can improve the surgical safety checklist.

Project lead Raul Uppot, MD’s objectives were to:

  1. design and develop a verbal electronic surgical safety checklist (a clinical assist decision interface, or CADI) specific to the needs of the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU); and
  2. to assess its impact on workflow and patient safety.

CADI pulls clinical information from the EHR and verbalizes it for procedure time-outs in the SICU. Overall, this project showed that a verbal electronic checklist could accurately verbalize information needed for a SICU time-out and could deliver objective information from the EHR at the point of care.

During this study, Dr. Uppot witnessed a thoracentesis in the SICU prior to which the surgical team performed the time-out using CADI. When CADI inquired about any anticoagulation medications, the team realized that heparin was still running (i.e., was not stopped). Without CADI, this issue may have been overlooked and, potentially, caused a hemothorax.

Key lessons learned during this study include:

  1. identifying the appropriate project stakeholders in advance (key players to complete a task are not always the senior leaders, but frontline trainees and nurses); and
  2. the importance of researching and accepting organizational IT security requirements.

For additional information: Contact Dr. Raul Uppot at [email protected]

Related Articles

    1x1_auto_2065

    “Are You Safe?” Case Study-based Learning for Multidisciplinary Teams

    Article
    This collection of case studies is designed to help all members of a multidisciplinary team reduce the risk of patient harm in the course of diagnosis and treatment. Office-based events that trigger malpractice cases present valuable opportunities to identify vulnerabilities in communication, clinical judgment, and patient care systems.
    exam table in doc office

    Resources for Presenters

    Article
    The CRICO Are You Safe? case studies contain information that you can access in different formats: web pages, one page handouts, and a slideshow version with additional data included.

    TEDMED Speakers: How Ignoring Medical Errors is Costing Lives

    Article
    TEDMED 2014 speakers raise the cry for the medical profession to face the fact that medical errors will occur and it is time to admit and address this. Danielle Ofri, MD a physician and professor, singles out the “toxic culture of perfection” that residents and doctors face and how she believes is degrading the overall patient experience. Elizabeth Nabel, MD, president of Brigham & Women's hospital, begs us to use humility with our knowledge. Patricia Horoho asks us to stop whispering about near misses and start fixing the system.
X
Cookies help us improve your website experience.
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies.
Confirm