The first email was sent in 1971, the first text message in 1992, and people sharing their thoughts have not paused since. Those novelties are now commonplace to virtually everyone, including physicians and other health care providers communicating about patients—and sometimes about adverse events. Because they are ubiquitous and seemingly ethereal, it’s easy—especially for less-experienced physicians—to forget that emails and (some) texts are part of the medical record, including some messages that could one day be excerpted and projected during a medical malpractice trial.
In the investigation of a medical professional liability (MPL) claim or lawsuit, emails or texts sent to a colleague, or the patient, may be subject to legal discovery. And if a colleague who was also involved in that patient’s care responded in a way that the plaintiff considers relevant, that colleague can be called as a witness or added to the case.
Even when a message does not directly reference substandard care, it can raise questions about professionalism, discrimination, chronic problems (“that’s the third time this month”) and other red flags. Of course, cringeworthy comments about a patient or colleague or equipment can render otherwise defensible MPL cases indefensible. But what most health care professionals need to be most wary of are more ambiguous comments that could be interpreted as damning by jurors pointed in that direction by a plaintiff’s attorney. Perception trumps intent.
An MPL proverb, “If it wasn’t documented, it wasn’t done,” speaks to the need for appropriate documentation of the patient’s care. Today it is equally fair to say that, if it was texted or emailed without thinking about how a third party might interpret it, then it should not have been sent. Indeed clinicians should assume that anything they write (with fingers or thumbs) about a patient will be read, and may be read in an unconsidered context.
Tips to Minimize Liability When Texting and Emailing About Patients
Against the backdrop of all patient encounters—and all patient-related communication—MPL cases are rare. Ruing a couple of prickly texts from three years ago probably isn’t worthwhile. But thinking about potential consequences of what you say in your email or text from today forward, could save you unnecessary hassles.
Advice is only helpful if we can recall it when most needed. If you’re sending a text in a fit of annoyance, under the stress of too much juggling, in the distraught aftermath of an adverse event, it is unlikely you will have a list of tips at hand or in mind. Making tips a habit is a good start, but perhaps forcing yourself to pause every time before you hit SEND, and consider how your words will look projected in a courtroom, is the best way to finish.