The aim of this CRICO-funded study was to develop a tool assessing key elements of the diagnostic assessment process and apply it to a series of diagnostic encounters examining clinical notes and encounters’ recorded transcripts. Additionally, the researchers aimed to correlate and contextualize these findings with measures of encounter time and physician burnout.

The researchers concluded that the study’s new tool shows promise as a means of assessing key elements of diagnostic quality in clinical encounters. Work conditions and physician reactions appear to correlate with diagnostic behaviors.

Citation for the Full Text Article

Khazen M, Sullivan EE, Arabadjis S, Ramos J, Mirica M, Olson A, Linzer M, Schiff GD. How does work environment relate to diagnostic quality? A prospective, mixed methods study in primary care. BMJ Open. 2023;13:e071241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071241 

Latest News from CRICO

Get all your medmal and patient safety news here.

    Utilization of Electronic Health Record Sex and Gender Demographic Fields: A Metadata and Mixed Methods Analysis

    CRICO Grants
    This CRICO co-funded retroactive study published in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association analyzed the records of patients 18 years of age or older in the Mass General Brigham health system with a first Legal Sex entry (registration requirement) between 2018 and 2022. The study was important because "Sex and gender demographic data are widely viewed as essential to providing culturally responsive gender affirming care and facilitating research and public health interventions."

    Postpartum Malpractice Claims: Can We Understand Preventable Harms and Socioeconomic Factors?

    The Doctor's Company, a Candello member, investigated postpartum claims to develop clinical recommendations to decrease the risks of postpartum morbidity and mortality.

    The Patient Safety Adoption Framework: A Practical Framework to Bridge the Know-Do Gap

    CRICO Grants
    Many patient safety initiatives fail to be adopted and implemented, even when proven effective. This creates the well-recognized know-do gap—which occurs when health care workers know what should be done based on evidence vs. what takes place in practice. To address this issue, CRICO funded the development of a patient safety adoption framework and had it evaluated by leaders in quality and safety. The framework and its findings were published online in the Journal of Patient Safety in April 2023.
Cookies help us improve your website experience.
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies.