News
Unintended Consequences of EHR Systems: A Narrative Review
May 15, 2017
Authors evaluated research that examined unintended consequences of IT in health care, including data from a research study that analyzed EHR-related medical malpractice claims from the CRICO Strategies national Comparative Benchmarking System (CBS).
Citation for the Full-text Article
Vanderhook S, Abraham J. Unintended consequences of EHR systems: A narrative review. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care. May 15, 2017; 6(1):218–225. [Subscription may be required.]
Related Article
Latest News from CRICO
Get all your medmal and patient safety news here.
A Quality Improvement Approach to Rheumatoid Arthritis Management With Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: Assessing Variability in a Treatment Pathway
News
A quality improvement project to improve rheumatoid arthritis management in clinical practice was supported by CRICO funds. The aim of the research was to understand the variability in prescribing practices of rheumatologists and reducing this variability if and when appropriate.
Patient and Provider Perspectives on Mammographic Breast Density Notification Legislation
News
The objective of this CRICO co-funded research was to elicit qualitative information from multiple stakeholders to understand varied perspectives on the subject of mammographic breast density (MBD) notification and inform best practices around implementation.
Pearson Pozner Awarded CRICO Grant to Establish Interprofessional Team Training Program
News
CRICO awarded a $200,000 grant to Brigham and Women's Hospital to facilitate an interprofessional team training program at the Neil and Elise Wallace STRATUS Center for Medical Simulation at Brigham's main campus.
Developing a Framework and Electronic Tool for Communicating Diagnostic Uncertainty in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study
News
CRICO Grants
This CRICO-funded study asked, “What are clinician and patient perspectives and innovative ways to communicate diagnostic uncertainty to patients?”