Description

Shoulder injury after flu vaccine administration.

Key Lessons

  • Develop annual competencies to ensure that staff are up to date on current practice

  • Identify a point person for the patient to contact following unexpected events

Clinical Sequence

A 43-year-old, otherwise healthy, patient received their annual flu vaccine at their primary care physician’s office. The flu vaccine was administered by a licensed practical nurse (LPN) via right deltoid muscle injection.

The patient had some initial tenderness at the injection site that progressed to not being able to lift their arm a few hours after the injection. The patient contacted the practice with complaints of right shoulder pain (using a pain scale of 1–10) their pain was an 8), which was not relieved with ibuprofen. They were instructed to call back if the pain did not improve.

Four weeks later, the patient was referred to orthopedics as the pain did not improve and they could not resume normal activities. The patient was diagnosed with shoulder bursitis. The patient was treated with steroid injections and physical therapy, and made a full recovery.

Allegation

The patient submitted a medical professional liability claim, alleging that improper technique of the vaccine administration caused their pain and shoulder injury.

Disposition

The case was settled in the low range. (<$99,000)

Analysis

Expert review determined that there was likely a deviation from the standard of care resulting in a shoulder injury.

The standard of care is determined by medical experts. In this case, expert review determined that the deltoid injection was likely administered outside the standard of care, either too high or too deep, based on the description by the patient and the injury after the injection.

Patients expect that medical staff administering vaccines or medications are trained on standard practice and they won’t experience harm from their medical team.

  • Practices should be familiar with the scope of practice for all staff and develop annual competencies to ensure that staff are up to date on current practice. This provides an opportunity to identify any potential gaps in practice as well as learning opportunities that may prevent patient harm.

  • Develop processes to review unexpected events. Identifying a point person for the patient to contact and to share learning opportunities or practice changes with the patient is important to rebuild trust.

Additional Material

Vaccine Administration and Clinical Guidance

Medication Administration in the Ambulatory Setting

Understanding “Standard of Care”

Apology & Disclosure Content


This is a fictitious case that illustrates commonly encountered issues and is for educational purposes only. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.


See More MPL Cases

CRICO’s case studies educate you on what can go wrong in business settings and how you can prevent similar issues.
    EPL Jan 2026

    Retaliation Allegation after Mental Health Leave

    Case Study
    Hospital employee alleges retaliation after returning from FMLA leave.
    A woman gently rests her hand on the shoulder of an elderly person, both smiling, in a cozy setting with soft colors

    Incidental Does Not Mean Insignificant

    Case Study
    Ordering providers were not informed of an incidental finding on a chest computer tomography (CT) scan, resulting in a delayed lung cancer diagnosis that ultimately metastasized and caused the patient’s death.
    In a hospital gown, a woman holds an MRI scan, examining it closely in a healthcare facility

    When Test Results Go Unspoken

    Case Study
    An abnormal finding from a computed tomography angiogram (CTA) scan was not communicated to the patient, leading to a delayed diagnosis of lung cancer and shortened life expectancy.
X
Cookies help us improve your website experience.
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies.
Confirm