Since the 2015 Institute of Medicine publication of Improving Diagnosis in Health Care, considerable attention and resources have been focused on protecting patients from errant or significantly delayed diagnoses. Certainly, all clinicians want to get this fundamental aspect of patient care right, but much of the work in this realm of patient safety has focused on just four specialties: internal medicine, family medicine, emergency medicine, and radiology. An analysis of more than 70,000 medical professional liability (MPL) cases in CRICO’s national MPL database indicates that those four specialties account for just half of all diagnosis-related MPL cases. The other 50% fall under the responsibility of more than 70 specialties and services, and caregivers in those services may be missing out on efforts to improve diagnostic skills and systems.

71,339 MPL Cases Closed 2010-2019

14,818 Cases with a diagnosis-related allegation

  • 7,402 (50%) Diagnosis-related cases involving Emergency Medicine (16%), Radiology (13%), Internal Medicine (11%), or Family Medicine (11%) as the responsible service
  • 7,416 (50%) Diagnosis-related cases not involving the top four responsible services (no single service accounts for more than 4%)

Regardless of who is caring for the patient—and who is facing diagnostic challenges—the most prominent underlying cause of diagnostic errors and delays stems from the patient assessment process.

The universality of diagnostic pitfalls across all specialties and services is evident again in the list of contributing factors specific to the patient assessment process.

SPS September Chart 2

Also worth noting: for both the top four services and the groups outside those four, one quarter (26%) of the missed diagnoses are some form of cancer.

In follow up to the release of Improving Diagnosis in Health Care, many organizations have formed—or refocused their attention—to help clinicians and their patients get to the right diagnosis and treatment as directly as possible. Everything from cognitive processing to electronic health record design is under scrutiny and the subject of improvement initiatives. The MPL experience outlined above indicates that those critical efforts should reach out to all specialties and services.

Additional Materials

Latest News from CRICO

Get all your medmal and patient safety news here.
    1x1_auto_0135

    Utilization of Electronic Health Record Sex and Gender Demographic Fields: A Metadata and Mixed Methods Analysis

    News
    CRICO Grants
    This CRICO co-funded retroactive study published in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association analyzed the records of patients 18 years of age or older in the Mass General Brigham health system with a first Legal Sex entry (registration requirement) between 2018 and 2022. The study was important because “Sex and gender demographic data are widely viewed as essential to providing culturally responsive gender affirming care and facilitating research and public health interventions.”
    Adam_Schaffer_WEB

    Teleradiology Medical Malpractice Cases

    News
    Candello Member
    This June 4, 2024, podcast by RSNA, features Dr. Francis Deng, a Diagnostic Neuroradiologist and Assistant Professor at Johns Hopkins University, who interviews CRICO’s Dr. Adam Schaffer about the characteristics of teleradiology medical malpractice cases.
    safety first radiology 1x1

    The Safety of Outpatient Health Care

    News
    Although most care occurs in the outpatient setting, knowledge of outpatient adverse events (AEs) remains limited. This study looks at adverse events in outpatient settings.
X
Cookies help us improve your website experience.
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies.
Confirm