News
Expert Consensus on Currently Accepted Measures of Harm
Dec 01, 2021
By hosting a modified World Café event, funded in-part by a CRICO grant, in March of 2018, the authors gathered experts to facilitate a focused discussion on the key events and triggers in their respective clinical domains. These experts were asked to rate each of these triggers by importance and suitability for chart review. Using these rated events, the authors were able to determine which factors were most suitable for chart review to monitor their frequency in the occurrence of adverse events.
Citation for the Full-text Article
Logan MS, Myers LC, Salmasian H, Levine DM, Roy CG, Reynolds ME, Sato L, Keohane C, Frits ML, Volk LA, Akindele RN, Randazza JM, Dulgarian SM, Shahian DM, Bates DW, Mort E. Expert consensus on currently accepted measures of harm. Journal of Patient Safety. 2021; 17(8):e1726-e1731. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000754
Latest News from CRICO
Hospitals are Looking for the Killer Amazon Alexa App
Integrating Research Quality Improvement and Medical Education for Better Handoffs and Safer Care Disseminating Adapting and Implementing the I-PASS Program
privately funded dissemination and implementation projects were carried out following the publication of the initial I-PASS study, which CRICO supported early on.
Non-technical Skills of Surgeons and Anaesthetists In Simulated Operating Theatre Crises
anaesthetist non-technical skills on the time it takes to resolve a crisis during simulation-based operative team training that was funded by a CRICO initiative.