News
Do No Harm
Dec 01, 2017
I-PASS, an initiative funded in part by CRICO, is also highlighted for its contribution to a reduction in medical errors related to hand-offs and the use of electronic medical records.
Citation for the Full-text Article
Mackles A. Do no harm. TD Magazine. December 1, 2017.
Related CRICO Articles
- CRICO Supports I-PASS Study Group: Eisenberg Award Recipient
- CRICO Blog: Investing in Patient Safety
- I-PASS and SBAR Handoff Tools Have Proven Benefits
- Integrating Research Quality Improvement and Medical Education for Better Handoffs and Safer Care Disseminating Adapting and Implementing the I-PASS Program
Latest News from CRICO
Get all your medmal and patient safety news here.
A Quality Improvement Approach to Rheumatoid Arthritis Management With Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: Assessing Variability in a Treatment Pathway
News
A quality improvement project to improve rheumatoid arthritis management in clinical practice was supported by CRICO funds. The aim of the research was to understand the variability in prescribing practices of rheumatologists and reducing this variability if and when appropriate.
Patient and Provider Perspectives on Mammographic Breast Density Notification Legislation
News
The objective of this CRICO co-funded research was to elicit qualitative information from multiple stakeholders to understand varied perspectives on the subject of mammographic breast density (MBD) notification and inform best practices around implementation.
Pearson Pozner Awarded CRICO Grant to Establish Interprofessional Team Training Program
News
CRICO awarded a $200,000 grant to Brigham and Women's Hospital to facilitate an interprofessional team training program at the Neil and Elise Wallace STRATUS Center for Medical Simulation at Brigham's main campus.
Developing a Framework and Electronic Tool for Communicating Diagnostic Uncertainty in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study
News
CRICO Grants
This CRICO-funded study asked, “What are clinician and patient perspectives and innovative ways to communicate diagnostic uncertainty to patients?”