To illustrate how things can go horribly wrong, and how preparing for the worst might be beneficial, we present a closed claim abstract (in which names and details have been modified).

Janet Levine’s second pregnancy was uncomplicated, except that she was carrying twins and the uppermost co-twin was in a breech presentation. Ms. Levine planned with Dr. Jennings, her OB/Gyn, to deliver her twins at a community hospital. They scheduled an induction, and the first twin was delivered vaginally, without difficulty.

When Dr. Jennings encountered problems delivering the second twin, he re-confirmed that it was still a breech presentation. During an attempt to turn the baby, the membranes ruptured. The umbilical cord was wrapped around the baby’s feet and lower body. Dr. Jennings continued with attempts to re-position the baby head-first for a vaginal delivery. When the cervix contracted on his hand, he called for the anesthesiologist to administer nitrous oxide to relax the uterus for further attempts to reposition the baby.

The room did not have an ultrasound machine, and the nurse monitored the baby’s heart rate with a hand held device. At one point the heart rate dropped to 43 beats per minute, but Dr. Jennings believed delivery was imminent. More time passed without successful vaginal delivery and so, he eventually called for a C-section.

The baby was born with very low Apgars. The infant had no gag reflex, and an EEG demonstrated severe brain damage. The baby was diagnosed with spastic quadriplegia and was blind and deaf prior to her death nearly six months later.

The parents sued Dr. Jennings, alleging negligent delays in delivery and treatment of fetal distress. The plaintiff’s expert witness had to be replaced less than two weeks before trial. Expert reviews for the defense were mixed. But the defense team believed it could prevail at trial with an effective defendant and expert witness. The jury returned a verdict for the defense.

Related:


Related Blog Posts

    Investing in Patient Safety

    Blog Post
    An article in today’s New York Time's suggests that malpractice reform may be best served by an investment in patient safety. At CRICO, we have been following just this model for decades by offering grant awards to stimulate research and patient safety interventions intended to improve the quality and safety of patient care. There are several clear examples of how these interventions have made a distinct impact on improving patient safety, including the I-PASS Study Group; just awarded the John M. Eisenberg Award for Innovation in Patient Safety and Quality.
    2016sympaka 066

    Mind the Gaps: Learning How to Avoid Miscommunication Pitfalls

    Blog Post
    Stories of patient harm resulting from a gap in communication were the inspiration for the 10th Annual CRICO Patient Safety Symposium, held at the Revere Hotel in Boston. 

    January Safety Salute | MedStar Health Creating a Just Culture

    Blog Post
    CRICO’s monthly Safety Salute recognizes a health care provider, leader, group, individual, or institution dedicated to and making positive improvements in patient safety.
X
Cookies help us improve your website experience.
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies.
Confirm