Failure to diagnose breast cancer affects health care providers across a spectrum of specialties. To reduce the likelihood of such events, CRICO identified the key factors contributing to allegations of mismanaged breast care and subsequently developed the CRICO Breast Care Management Algorithm. Our goal is to aid primary care providers at various decision points across three domains of breast health care:

  • Asymptomatic women eligible for screening
  • Individuals seeking an assessment of their risks for developing breast cancer
  • Patients who present with specific breast complaints

The CRICO Algorithm is designed to help providers of primary breast care. Providers are expected to gather information such as family history, atypia on previous biopsy, thoracic radiation before age 30, and reproductive risk factors to determine if changes to normal screening, or a referral to high-risk counseling, is indicated.

Even after a referral, providers of primary breast care have an ongoing responsibility for tracking and coordinating their patients’ ongoing breast care. In addition to being a tenet of good care, comprehensive provider follow up is a significant safeguard against allegations of failure to diagnose breast cancer.

The 2019 : A Decision Support Tool CRICO Breast Care Management Algorithmcontains changes or enhancements in the following areas:

RECOMMENDATIONS


  • Changes to age-related screening recommendations for women at usual risk for breast cancer
  • Addition of recommendations regarding breast density
  • Addition of recommendation to consider breast MRI for women with >20% lifetime risk of breast cancer

RISK MANAGEMENT FOR BREAST CARE


  • Recommendations for periodic discussion with patients age 40–49 regarding breast cancer risk assessment
  • Guidance for supporting (average risk) patients with questions after they have been notified they have dense breasts

RISK ASSESSMENT


  • Streamlining the risk assessment process
  • Clarifying the role of genetic testing for women without a known predisposition to breast cancer
  • More information of risk prediction models

SPONTANEOUS NIPPLE DISCHARGE


  • Clarification regarding follow up to exam findings

PHYSICIAN-PATIENT DISCUSSION AND TAKE-HOME POINTS RELATED TO BREAST PATIENT SAFETY


  • Included breast density section
  • Supporting evidence was reviewed and updated

Related Blog Posts

    Investing in Patient Safety

    Blog Post
    An article in today’s New York Time's suggests that malpractice reform may be best served by an investment in patient safety. At CRICO, we have been following just this model for decades by offering grant awards to stimulate research and patient safety interventions intended to improve the quality and safety of patient care. There are several clear examples of how these interventions have made a distinct impact on improving patient safety, including the I-PASS Study Group; just awarded the John M. Eisenberg Award for Innovation in Patient Safety and Quality.
    2016sympaka 066

    Mind the Gaps: Learning How to Avoid Miscommunication Pitfalls

    Blog Post
    Stories of patient harm resulting from a gap in communication were the inspiration for the 10th Annual CRICO Patient Safety Symposium, held at the Revere Hotel in Boston. 

    January Safety Salute | MedStar Health Creating a Just Culture

    Blog Post
    CRICO’s monthly Safety Salute recognizes a health care provider, leader, group, individual, or institution dedicated to and making positive improvements in patient safety.
X
Cookies help us improve your website experience.
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies.
Confirm