Podcast
Late Follow Up Miffed Patient in 1821 Ortho Case
Sep 17, 2012
0:00
0:00
Duration: 9:10
Nation’s “first malpractice crisis” resulted in 1821, after a horse fell on a man and the surgeon waited a month to visit his patient to see if his attempted hip reduction worked.
This podcast is an episode of Case Studies (now MedMal Insider). You can find other episodes and subscribe using the links to the left.
Subscribe to MedMal Insider
Sign up and keep up.
About the series
Even in the safest healthcare setting, things can go wrong. For more than 40 years, CRICO has analyzed MPL cases from the Harvard medical community. Join our experts as they unpack what occurred and the lessons learned for safer patient care from the causes of these errors.
Episodes
Recent Episodes from the MedMal Insider Series
Bad Finger, Good Documentation
Podcast
A patient sued her hand surgeon, claiming the surgical approach increased the chance that their finger wouldn’t fully heal from a prior fracture. The defense leaned on contemporaneous clinical notes and documentation of the consent process to achieve a defense verdict.
Communication Post-op Blamed in Large Settlement
Podcast
A cholecystectomy patient alleged that mishandling of her post-operative calls to the surgical practice and lack of follow-up caused her post-operative complications. Like many cases, how the surgical practice communicated with the patient after a complication occurred was a key aspect.
Battery in Toddler’s Nose Missed at First
Podcast
Parents alleged that a delayed diagnosis of a foreign body in their child’s nose caused preventable nosebleeds, nasal infection, nasal septal perforation, and the need for surgery. The malpractice claim named the pediatric group, two pediatricians, and a pediatric nurse practitioner, and was settled in the low range.
A Pending Test at Discharge and a Return with Sepsis
Podcast
A 68-year-old male was admitted to the hospital after falling on ice and feeling short of breath. Two days after discharge, the patient arrived by ambulance at another hospital in septic shock. The patient filed a claim against the hospital, alleging that the failure to communicate a critical lab result required readmission and several weeks of follow-up treatment.
Subscribe to MedMal Insider
Sign up and keep up.