Podcast
Late Follow Up Miffed Patient in 1821 Ortho Case
Sep 17, 2012
0:00
0:00
Duration: 9:10
Nation’s “first malpractice crisis” resulted in 1821, after a horse fell on a man and the surgeon waited a month to visit his patient to see if his attempted hip reduction worked.
This podcast is an episode of Case Studies. You can find other episodes and subscribe using the links to the left.
Subscribe to MedMal Insider
Sign up and keep up.
About the series
Even in the safest healthcare setting, things can go wrong. For more than 40 years, CRICO has analyzed MPL cases from the Harvard medical community. Join our experts as they unpack what occurred and the lessons learned for safer patient care from the causes of these errors.
Episodes
Recent Episodes from the MedMal Insider Series
Response to Charges of Discrimination can Help or Hurt a Hospital, Any Employer
Podcast
When hospitals and medical practices face charges of discrimination from employees, the consequences can include litigation, large payments, morale problems, and less quality care for the patients they serve. How an employer responds can make all the difference in outcomes. Based on closed claims in the Harvard medical system, two cases illustrate that point. We interview Megan Kures, of Hamel, Marcin, Dunn, Reardon and Shea, who offers some principles to follow.
Health Payment Reform Act: Rules to Protect Providers
Podcast
After a state medical error disclosure and apology law went into effect in November 2012, health providers in Massachusetts have protections and rules to follow.
Overdose or Poor Documentation?
Podcast
The patient’s family alleged that improper management of the patient under anesthesia resulted in cardiorespiratory arrest, permanent brain damage, and a persistent vegetative state. While the cause of the patient’s cardiac arrest is uncertain, the CRNA failed to note which medications and doses were administered during the procedure, and the case was settled for more than $1 million.
Slow to Diagnose Endocarditis After Repeat Visits
Podcast
One thing that seemed to be missing in this particular evaluation was a formal differential diagnosis that may have been present in the physician’s brain, but wasn’t documented, and there’s no evidence that it was really thought about.
Subscribe to MedMal Insider
Sign up and keep up.