CRICO MDs ONLY: Register to access your facesheet, and more.

Advanced Search

  • Topic
  • Specialty
  • Content Type

spacer sps-callout

Also Related

< Back To Patient Safety
0 dislikes

< Hide

Comments For

Emerging Risks in Interventional Radiology


< Shrink

Add Your Voice

All comments are posted anonymously. Your comment will be attributed to: "Anonymous user."

post comment


Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

Emerging Risks in Interventional Radiology

By Jock Hoffman, CRICO

Related to: Medication, Other Specialties, Surgery

A 65-year-old male was admitted for treatment of lymphoma...

On hospital day 5, the patient developed an acute change in mental status that worsened over the day; he was unable to tolerate a lumbar puncture at the bedside. In Interventional Radiology (IR), the patient required incremental doses of Ativan for the management of his altered mental status and acute agitation. The incremental doses of medication were obtained from the inpatient unit, but administered by the IR nurse. The patient arrested and expired during the procedure.

Emerging Risk: Interventional Radiology

Responsible Service

of Cases1

of Cases

of Losses2

diagnostic radiology 2,259        4%       4%      
interventional radiology 317       <1%       <1%      

1.     2007–2016 (N=58,691 cases, $11.5B incurred losses.
2.     Losses are “total incurred losses” which includes reserves on open and payments on closed cases

Source: National Comparative Benchmarking System, CRICO


Analysis of CRICO’s National Comparative Benchmarking System (CBS) indicates that cases like the one above, in which Interventional Radiology* is the responsible service, account for less than one percent of all claims and suits filed since 2007, and just under one percent of financial losses. As the 2013 CBS Report, Malpractice Risks of Routine Medical Procedures indicated, however, the malpractice exposure for procedures outside the operating room is a growing concern. IR-related malpractice cases are rare, but they are not insignificant, especially given the dramatic shifts in IR practice. A shared sense of increased vulnerability in the IR setting led the Academic Medical Centers Patient Safety Organization (AMC PSO) to publish Patient Safety Framework for Risk Mitigation in Interventional Radiology.

When IR procedures are performed beyond the reach of a hospital’s safety net, then the risks associated with a complication during an IR procedure can be magnified. If the IR location is not designed to manage emergencies, or the staff is not adequately trained to rescue patients who experience complications, then IR patients and providers are at risk of serious injury and malpractice allegations.

The recently published Patient Safety Framework for Risk Mitigation in Interventional Radiology outlines recommendations for improved areas in the situational awareness and coordination of resources, staffing, and patient transfer of care along with suggestions to institutional leadership for improving collaboration with other departments.

*Interventional Radiology procedures include the use radiological image guidance (X-ray fluoroscopy, ultrasound, CT, or MRI).


Additional Material

February 26, 2018
0 dislikes

< Back To Patient Safety