• Benchmarking Reports
• Research Presentations
• Candello Discover Clinical Events
• Client Case Studies

Benefits of Comparative Data

• The selection of data profiles offered here represent a small sample of what is available to participating members of our Candello community. If you find this online data beneficial, membership affords insurers and healthcare organizations a wealth of additional comparative data that provides perspective on key patient safety vulnerabilities and helps target opportunities for improvement. To learn more about participating in our community, contact us here.

Documentation

• 		About Candello: printable overview
  		Glossary: terms used throughout the slides

Candello Methodology

• Candello Solutions contains cases originating from a broad cross section of the US, including large urban centers and rural regions from the east to west coast and north to south.
  
  

  The CRICO coding taxonomy captures 10–15 clinical and/or system factors on each medmal case.
  
  

  Organizations contributing cases to the database are categorized by organizational type.
  
  

  Jurisdictional differences do not impact the clinical environment in which care is delivered. As such, comparison of deeply coded malpractice data allows users to evaluate the clinical factors that drive risks and impact outcomes.
  
  

  The data presented in Candello are based on Assert Year (or Claim Made Year) rather than Loss Year (or Event Date), to further remove variability based on statutes of limitation.