Failure to Rule Out Bacterial Meningitis

Print Case Study

Expand All / Collapse All

Description

A three-month-old baby, seen in the ED and her PCP's office five times over nine days, was diagnosed with bacterial meningitis which subsequently led to seizures, developmental delays, and further complications.

Key Lessons

  • A pattern of unresolved complaints and discharges should trigger a full review of the patient's situation.
  • The timing of reporting of lab results can affect care.
  • Documentation of pertinent negatives is important in establishing adherence to the standard of care.

Clinical Sequence

A previously healthy three-month-old (14 weeks) presented to her primary care physician's (PCP) office for a two-day fever. She was discharged with the diagnosis of a viral illness. Two days later she was taken to the Emergency Department (ED), where her mother reported continued fevers, nasal congestion (for the prior two weeks), a runny nose, and a cough. Her temperature was 102.5°F, but she appeared, otherwise, well. No lab tests were ordered; the child was discharged home with the diagnosis of a viral illness.

Five days later, the baby was brought to her PCP's office with the primary complaint of no bowel movement and fevers up to 101°F at home for the past two days. She had been eating well and had good urine output. In the office, her temperature was 104.9°F, she was crying (but consolable), her tympanic membranes, oropharynx, and lungs were clear. Her neck was supple and no rashes were present. The PCP sent the baby to the ED for a fever work up.

In the ED, her temperature was 103.6°F; she was alert, but uncomfortable. A WBC was 14,290 with 46 bands, urinalysis showed trace protein and rare WBC; her urine and blood cultures were pending. The patient was observed for two hours, then discharged with Tylenol; her mother was told to call in a few days for the culture results. Post-discharge, her blood culture was found positive for streptococcus. The ED physician relayed this information to the physician covering for the PCP…who then informed both the PCP and the mother of these results.

The next day, the mother took her daughter to the PCP's office where she was found to be febrile, irritable, and sleepy. After reviewing the labs from the prior day, the PCP diagnosed bacteremia. He gave the patient antibiotic ceftriaxone 360mg IM, and told the mother to increase her fluids and follow up in 24 hours or go to the ED if the symptoms became worse. At 6 p.m., the mother brought her daughter to the ED due to inconsolable crying, gasping for air, left eye swelling, decreased oral input. and decreased urine output. Her temperature was 102.6°F, heart rate 200, and respiratory rate 60. She was crying, irritable, tachycardic, mottled, and had a capillary refill time of five seconds. She was given IV fluid, IV ceftriaxone, and IV vancomycin. A lumbar puncture was positive for meningitis. The patient was admitted to the PICU, intubated, and had a seizure and severe neurological injury leaving her blind and deaf. She has a seizure disorder and a ventricular peritoneal shunt.

Allegation

The patient's mother filed a suit against the PCP and the ED physician, claiming that a failure to administer prophylactic antibiotics and perform a lumbar puncture, delayed the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis and opportunity for treatment.

Disposition

The case was settled in excess of one million dollars.

Analysis

Clinical Perspective

  1. The child's borderline age impacted the diagnostic process. For non-toxic appearing febrile children older than three months, the initial evaluation need not include a lumbar puncture.

    Certain clinical and laboratory findings should push a clinician to pursue an atypical diagnostic path. Although this child had a normal WBC, the differential was significantly abnormal, possible indicating an ongoing infection.

  2. Failure to adequately address a fever with leukocytosis and left shift.

    Some explanation for the bandemia should be sought prior to (multiple) discharges.

  3. No documentation of neurologic exam or LP on a patient with fever and leukocytosis of unknown source, and no empiric initiation of antibiotics.

    With fever of unknown etiology, meningitis must be on the differential. Persistent fever without a source and a possible bacterial should receive empiric antibiotics until meningitis and sepsis can be ruled out.

  4. No admission to the hospital in a patient with bacteremia.

    Bacteremia in a three-month-old infant requires an LP to look for a source and admission to the hospital for IV antibiotics until the positive blood culture is determined to be caused by contaminant or the bacterial sensitivities are identified.

Patient Perspective

  1. The diagnosis of meningitis was delayed despite the multiple visits to the primary care doctor and the ED.

    Multiple patient visits for the same complaint should prompt a more thorough workup.

  2. My daughter could have been saved the injuries that she sustained if the complete fever workup had been performed and antibiotics had been given.

    If antibiotics were not given, the reasons should have been explained to the family and this conversation should have been documented.

Risk Management Perspective

  1. Abnormal lab results were not definitively addressed.

    All abnormal lab results should be documented and explained in the chart.

  2. Multiple providers caused a discontinuity of care and an absence of the big picture.

    Multiple visits, phone calls, and evaluations by several different physicians result in various points in the case where care needs to be more aggressively managed.

Legal Defense Perspective

  1. This case had examples of poor clinical judgment on the part of providers, multiple attempts by the mother to have her child examined, and severe injury caused by delayed diagnosis.

    Jurors empathize with a plaintiff who, despite her efforts, did not receive the appropriate level of care and suffered as a result.

  2. The tragic outcome of the case, coupled with the mother's diligent compliance with discharge instructions, inhibited an aggressive defense strategy.

    For cases with the lack of supporting defense experts, and a disastrous outcome for the patient, the defense strategy has to focus on finding a resolution that stems the negative impact on all parties and provides appropriate financial and emotional support.